Debate: Does Spelling Matter?

Blogging, Debate, Marketing, Writing

As a writer, and a lover of books, I have always been a natural proofreader. I think I get it from my Mum, and neither of us are capable at looking at a menu or a sign in a street without subconsciously noticing spelling mistakes.

However, seeing things like this has opened up this big conflict inside me. On one side, I hate to see spelling errors, but then the other side of me is saying “yes, but we can still understand what it being said, so does it matter?”

Throughout history, the spelling of words has altered to fit current needs with the eventual growth of standardised spellings. So, it seems fairly logical that spellings will continue evolving. However, I don’t think any linguist could have predicted that we would revert back to such an unstandardised state.

So, here’s the question: Are there times when spelling does or doesn’t matter?

Here are my thoughts:

When it does matter:

Example: Recently we have spotted a cafe that spelt its own company name wrong, and a leading department store that had misspelt the name of a food product on a sign that was no doubt used in every single one of their shops, right across the country!

Why this is bad: It looks incredibly unprofessional, especially on a business with a strong reputation and a large collection of shops nationally. Whilst a small business could be excused for have more things to worry about, and not enough time in the sense that the signs were probably written in a rush, larger companies have no excuse.

Larger companies can typically afford to hire more staff than a small one, so surely they can expand someone’s duties to proofreading?

Example: Then there is the case of a certain series of books, that you might have heard of – or even read – called “Twilight”, which have become almost as notorious for their poor spelling, as they have for their absolute ridiculousness – I mean, c’mon sparkling vampires, where the females grow make-up?!

Why this is bad: I’ve done work experience in the Editorial Department of a Publishers, in the past, and I know how important the role of the Editor is. Most importantly, I know how important the role of the proofreader is, so the idea that a proofreader has missed these mistakes, not only once, but every single time that the books have been reprinted, is just astounding.

I think that if the mistakes were evident in the first prints, that would be acceptable, because sure mistakes are missed, especially when Editors might be a little less lenient on books that they are not sure will sell that well. However, surely reviews etc have highlighted the mistakes, so a big publishing house has no excuse but to correct them for further reprints, when they know that people are going to buy them!

When it doesn’t matter:

Example: Blogs and newspapers are rife with spelling and grammar errors, mainly because both are written at a past pace typically to a tight schedule. The problem really lies in the way that they are produced, because they are typed so quickly, meaning a slight flick of a finger towards the wrong key can alter spelling without even noticing.

Why is doesn’t matter: Blogs are typically a personal affair, as a single person shares their thoughts and opinions on something that they are passionate about. Most of the time, these people are writing for themselves, around their full-time jobs, so they don’t have the time to fret about mistakes. Plus, it isn’t the spelling or the grammar, but more what is actually being said that matters.

When it comes to newspapers, we’ve all heard the phrase “tomorrow’s chip paper” haven’t we? I personally don’t see the point of moaning about a spelling mistake in something that will be forgotten by the next day. Unlike magazines, who have longer to produce copy, a newspaper might only have an hour – or even less – to produce a crucial story, so spelling is again second best to the actual content.

Example: Social media and this need to share practically everything has led to a rise in spelling errors, either because people are attempting to shorten what they have to say, or because they are having to write things that in the past they would have predominantly used in spoken communication.

For me, this last point sparks the biggest problem for a lot of people, especially on Facebook. As they are used to speaking, more than writing, many tend to type as they speak, which has led to a rise in the rise of the word “of”, when the correct word is actually “have”.

Why this doesn’t matter: Despite often having to get out a translator to figure out what some people are saying, it is usually possible. And surely that was all the person was ever intending to do right? Share a thought or an opinion.


Spelling matters when you are a company selling a product. Spelling does not matter when what you have to say far overpowers the spelling of it

What do you think? Do you think spelling still matters, or are we all just moaning about nothing? Do you think that it depends on the circumstances, and should there be different rules for different types of writing?

Hire Me // Portfolio


One thought on “Debate: Does Spelling Matter?

  1. Grammr and the decline of our civilization
    I need to come back to this again, because deep down, the educated people reading this aren’t
    sure yet. The argument for rote, for primers, for drill and practice, and for grammar is made
    vivid within ten seconds of checking out YouTube. Here’s a sample comment:


    We’re all going down the drain. Too much profanity, no verb conjugation, incomplete
    thoughts, and poor analysis, everywhere you look, even among people running for President.

    I don’t think the problem is lack of access to role models, or to Strunk and White, or to strict

    I think the problem is that kids don’t care. Because they don’t have to. And if someone doesn’t
    care, all the drilling isn’t going to change a thing.

    The way we save the written word, intellectual discourse, and reason is by training kids to care.

    Only 3 percent of Americans can locate Greece on a map. (That’s not true, but if it were, you
    wouldn’t be surprised, because we’re idiots about stuff like that.)

    The question is: Will spending more time drilling kids on the map of the world solve this
    problem? Is our apathy about world affairs a function of a lack of exposure to the map in

    Of course not.

    No, the problem isn’t that we haven’t spent enough hours memorizing the map. The problem
    is that we don’t want to.

    Teachers aren’t given the time or the resources or, most important, the expectation that they
    should sell students on why.

    A kid who is into dinosaurs has no trouble discussing the allosaurus/brontosaurus controversy.
    A student interested in fixing up his dad’s old car will have no trouble understanding the
    mechanics of the carburetor. And the young Hilary Clintons among us, those who are
    fascinated by the world, understand quite clearly where Greece is.

    If you’re running an institution based on compliance and obedience, you don’t reach for
    motivation as a tool. It feels soft, even liberal, to imagine that you have to sell people on making
    the effort to learn what’s on the agenda.

    I’m not sure it matters how it feels to the teacher. What matters is that motivation is the only
    way to generate real learning, actual creativity, and the bias for action that Open book, open

    Futurist Michio Kaku points out that soon, it will be easy for every student and worker to have
    contact lenses hooked up to the Internet.

    One use will be that whatever you’re reading can be instantly searched online, and any
    questions that can be answered this way, will be answered this way. Already, there are simple
    plug-ins that allow you to search any word or phrase in the document you’re currently reading

    Forget about futurists and contact lenses. This is something we can do right now, on any text
    on any screen on just about any computer.

    What’s the point of testing someone’s ability to cram for a test if we’re never going to have to
    cram for anything ever again? If I can find the answer in three seconds online, the skill of
    memorizing a fact for twelve hours (and then forgetting it) is not only useless, it’s insane.

    In an open-book/open-note environment, the ability to synthesize complex ideas and to invent
    new concepts is far more useful than drill and practice. It might be harder (at first) to write tests, and it might be harder to grade them, but the goal of school isn’t to make the educational industrial complex easy to run; it’s to create a better generation of workers and citizens.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s